Sybil defence is holding us back.
08 Sep 2023, 13:13
Sybil defence is holding us back.
Distributed permissionless networks can meet a multitude of global-scale needs if Sybil is taken care of.
But step outside of blockchain land for a while, and you will see that she hasn't got any teeth …
🧵
Same news in other sources
308 Sep 2023, 13:18
So DOSing specific groups does nothing to the network as a whole.
And DOSing all other nodes you don't control (if you _could_ Sybil and control specific groups and somehow DOS the rest)?
So DOSing specific groups does nothing to the network as a whole.
So DOSing specific groups does nothing to the network as a whole.
And DOSing all other nodes you don't control (if you _could_ Sybil and control specific groups and somehow DOS the rest)?
08 Sep 2023, 13:18
The Safe Network isn't about the necessity of an honest network or not. It's not about total order consensus or bust.
It’s a data network powered by people: A massive open-to-everyone hard disk, that's private, resilient and self-healing.
Bottomless, Internet-native storage.
The Safe Network isn't about the necessity of an honest network or not. It's not about total order consensus or bust.
The Safe Network isn't about the necessity of an honest network or not. It's not about total order consensus or bust.
It’s a data network powered by people: A massive open-to-everyone hard disk, that's private, resilient and self-healing.
Bottomless, Internet-native storage.
08 Sep 2023, 13:18
Well, we introduce the chaos of the DAG and archive nodes…
And there we only need one node to be honest, and the attack is thwarted.
Just one.
Well, we introduce the chaos of the DAG and archive nodes….
Well, we introduce the chaos of the DAG and archive nodes…
And there we only need one node to be honest, and the attack is thwarted.
Just one.